Ads feature amateurs, play it safe

first_imgNEW YORK – Along with the trademark Clydesdales, talking animals and high-end computer graphics, there was a new entry this year in the annual showdown of advertisers in the Super Bowl: amateurs. Starting in the first quarter, a goofy spot for Doritos showing a hapless driver distracted by a pretty woman passing by marked the first time a purely amateur-created ad aired during the Super Bowl. Frito-Lay, the PepsiCo Inc. division that makes Doritos, ran an online competition to pick the winning spot. Katie Crabb, a freshman at the University of Wisconsin at Stevens Point, was the winner of a separate contest by General Motors Corp. and had her idea for an ad made into reality by Chevrolet’s marketing division. Despite being made by a newcomer, that ad was true to the tradition of using oddball humor in Super Bowl ads, showing a number of men stripping off their shirts – and some other articles of clothing – at the sight of a new Chevy HHR rolling down the street. Sight gags were back, including one from Bud Light early in the game showing a rather unusual tactic for winning at rock-paper-scissors – throwing an actual rock at the head of your opponent. The gag wasn’t completely new, however, since last year Sprint Nextel Corp. featured a phone with a “crime deterrent” – which turned out to be throwing the phone at someone’s head. FedEx Corp. combined a sight gag with another trademark of big ticket Super Bowl spots, fancy computer graphics, with an other-worldy ad showing an office worker drifting off into space from the world’s first office on the moon, only to be clobbered by a passing meteor. A lot was riding on the ads, and not just because CBS Corp. was charging as much as $2.6million for a 30-second spot during the game. With about 90million people watching, it’s the most-viewed program all year on television, and the ads are subject to intense scrutiny, both by amateurs and the marketing industry. Coca-Cola Co. was back in the game after a long absence, taking on its rival Pepsi with a number of creative ads, including an homage to Black History Month with an understated ad showing the changing shapes of Coke bottles over time as milestones in black history appeared alongside. That ad referred indirectly to the fact that, for the first time, both coaches in the game are black, and at least one other spot also highlighted Black History Month. Some of the uses of humor didn’t resonate well with experts. Stephen Greyser, a professor at Harvard Business School specializing in communications and the business of sports, said the rock-throwing spot by Anheuser-Busch Cos.’ Bud Light was “attention-getting” but also “had a nasty character to it.” Bud Light, which often swings for the fences with wacky jabs at humor, scored better with Greyser with a different spot showing an auctioneer saying wedding vows at hyper-fast speed. Greyser said that spot had a much broader appeal. The job-search company CareerBuilder ditched its longtime office-monkey pitchmen of years past in favor of a jungle combat scene among office workers, where office supplies become weapons. Think of “Dilbert” meets “Lord of the Flies.” Tim Calkins, a marketing professor at the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University who runs a panel of students to rate the ads, called this year’s batch a “mixed bag,” saying advertisers were “being safe,” with no one “pushing the edge of either creativity or taste.” An ad early in the game for Blockbuster Inc. with computer animations of animals trying to push, click and – ouch – drag an actual mouse resonated well with members of his panel, who said it was creative and also delivered the company’s message. The panel found a spot by King Pharmaceuticals Inc. showing a guy dressed up in a giant red heart costume “puzzling,” while Garmin International Inc.’s oddball spot with a showdown between a superhero-like character and a monster made from maps was deemed “hard to follow.” Sight gags back Back in the game Hitchhiking gag Later in the game, Bud Light won laughs with a spot showing a guy clearly losing points with his girlfriend by wanting to pick up a hitchhiker on a dark road, despite the fact that he’s carrying an axe. Everything turns out fine after the hitchhiker reassures the man that it’s actually just a bottle opener. Revlon was one of a rare few to appeal to the female audience, unveiling a spot with scenes of the singer Sheryl Crowe on tour and doing a rendition of Buddy Holly’s “Not Fade Away.” The NFL itself, meanwhile, got into the “user-generated” theme with a spot near the end of the game whose idea was contributed by a fan, Gino Bona, of Portsmouth, N.H., taking a light look at the anguish fans go through at the end of the NFL season. 160Want local news?Sign up for the Localist and stay informed Something went wrong. Please try again.subscribeCongratulations! You’re all set!last_img read more

A `victory for water quality’

first_img AD Quality Auto 360p 720p 1080p Top articles1/5READ MOREOregon Ducks football players get stuck on Disney ride during Rose Bowl eventFarfsing said he considered a January appellate court decision – that an environmental impact report must be done before cities must comply with the program – more significant. The trash reduction program is “invalidated” until a report is approved, he said. The cities and the water board have been battling since 2001, when the board adopted a program to eliminate trash flowing into the Los Angeles River. The board required cities to reduce trash by 10 percent a year for 10 years. City officials argued the cleanup would be too costly, that a zero-trash requirement was impossible and there was no telling if the measures would work. “We all want to protect our environment,” said Jeff Hobbs, who also represents the coalition of cities. “The problem is the water boards cannot tell us how much it is going to cost the cities.” Hobbs said he did not want to see cities cutting senior services, public recreation and other programs in order to pay for an “unfunded mandate.” In what state and regional water boards called a major victory for water quality, the state Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal by 22 cities – 15 in the San Gabriel Valley and Whittier areas – challenging a program that made them responsible for reducing trash flows into storm drains that flow to the ocean. “This is a huge victory for water quality,” David Nahai, chairman of the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, said Thursday. He said he hoped cities would use their resources to improve water quality rather than litigate. But representatives of the cities that sued the water boards had a different interpretation of Wednesday’s decision by the court to not hear the appeal. “It’s not the end of the battle,” said Ken Farfsing, city manager for Signal Hill and spokesman for the Coalition for Practical Regulation, a group of cities that includes Arcadia, Baldwin Park, Diamond Bar, Irwindale, Monrovia, Montebello, Monterey Park, Pico Rivera, Rosemead, San Gabriel, Santa Fe Springs, Sierra Madre, South Pasadena, West Covina and Whittier. Nahai said most of the steps cities can take to improve water runoff quality are simple, low-tech solutions such as increasing street sweeping, educating the public not to litter, installing catch devices, adding more trash cans, emptying catch basins, and educating local businesses about proper trash disposal. Earlier, the court also threw out arguments that a more detailed cost-benefit analysis was required and that a study was needed to determine the harmful effects of garbage in the water, Nahai said. Farfsing said the environmental impact report gives the water board a chance to rethink its requirements and come up with less costly ways for cities to comply with the program. “The regional board has a chance now to make sense of their \. And maybe we won’t challenge it,” he said. (626) 962-8811, Ext. 2306160Want local news?Sign up for the Localist and stay informed Something went wrong. Please try again.subscribeCongratulations! You’re all set!last_img read more